1
0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/animath/si/plateforme.git synced 2024-12-26 19:42:22 +00:00
plateforme-tfjm2/tfjm/static/eteam/Written_review.tex
Emmy D'Anello 620bbe7817
Defender => Reporter
Signed-off-by: Emmy D'Anello <emmy.danello@animath.fr>
2024-07-06 22:12:07 +02:00

197 lines
3.9 KiB
TeX

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[margin=2cm]{geometry} % marges
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\title{Note de synthèse}
\begin{document}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{center}
\begin{Huge}
ETEAM
\end{Huge}
\bigskip
\begin{Large}
WRITTEN REVIEW
\end{Large}
\end{center}
Round \underline{~~~~} pool \underline{~~~~}
\medskip
Problem \underline{~~~~} reported by team \underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}
\medskip
Written review of the team \underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~} in the role of : ~ $\square$ Opponent ~ $\square$ Reviewer ~ $\square$ Observer
\section*{Evaluation, question by question, of the solution}
Note: it is possible to tick between the boxes for an intermediate case.
\medskip
\noindent
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Question & ER & ~PA~ & ~SE~ & NA \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Question & ER & ~PA~ & ~SE~ & NA \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
& & & & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\hfill
\begin{minipage}{0.27\textwidth}
ER : entirely resolved, nor error, nor mathematical lack
\smallskip
PA : partially answered
\smallskip
SE : some elements of answer
\smallskip
NA : not addressed
\bigskip
\end{minipage}
\section*{Qualitative evaluation of the solution}
Give your opinion regarding the solution. In particular, highlight the positive points (important, original
ideas, etc.) and specify what could have improved the solution.
\vfill
\begin{center}
\textbf{General evaluation of the solution:} ~ $\square$ Excellent ~ $\square$ Good ~ $\square$ Suffisant ~ $\square$ Average ~ $\square$ Poor
\end{center}
\newpage
\section*{Errors and inaccuracies}
List below in descending order of importance no more than four errors and/or inaccuracies in your opinion, specifying
the question concerned, the page, the paragraph and the type of remark.
\medskip
1. Question \underline{~~~~~~} Page \underline{~~~~~~} Paragraph \underline{~~~~~~}
$\square$ Major mistake ~ $\square$ Minor mistake ~ $\square$ Inaccuracy ~ $\square$ Other: \underline{~~~~~~~~}
Description :
\vfill
2. Question \underline{~~~~~~} Page \underline{~~~~~~} Paragraph \underline{~~~~~~}
$\square$ Major mistake ~ $\square$ Minor mistake ~ $\square$ Inaccuracy ~ $\square$ Other: \underline{~~~~~~~~}
Description :
\vfill
3. Question \underline{~~~~~~} Page \underline{~~~~~~} Paragraph \underline{~~~~~~}
$\square$ Major mistake ~ $\square$ Minor mistake ~ $\square$ Inaccuracy ~ $\square$ Other: \underline{~~~~~~~~}
Description :
\vfill
4. Question \underline{~~~~~~} Page \underline{~~~~~~} Paragraph \underline{~~~~~~}
$\square$ Major mistake ~ $\square$ Minor mistake ~ $\square$ Inaccuracy ~ $\square$ Other: \underline{~~~~~~~~}
Description :
\vfill
\section*{Positive aspects}
Identify at most two strong points of the solution and say why (examples: relevant propositions, important ideas,
relevant generalizations, significant examples, original constructions, etc.).
\medskip
1. Question \underline{~~~~~~} Page \underline{~~~~~~} Paragraph \underline{~~~~~~}
Description :
\vfill
2. Question \underline{~~~~~~} Page \underline{~~~~~~} Paragraph \underline{~~~~~~}
Description :
\vfill
\section*{Other remarks (optional)}
Give your opinion regarding the presentation of the solution (readability, etc.).
\vfill
\end{document}